DO YOU HAVE A LIEN CLAIM BOND CLAIM OR BOTH

By Douglas J. Roberts, Esq. Contractors working on construction projects must be proactive to protect their rights from the very beginning of the project. While a general contractor, subcontractor or material supplier will typically have a claim for breach of contract against their customer, the Construction Lien Law, Chapter 713, et seq., provides additional rights […]

MILLER ACT BONDS: EQUAL PROTECTION FOR SUBCONTRACTORS AND SUPPLIERS ON A FEDERAL PROJECT

By: Stearns, Roberts & Guttentag, LLC Federally owned property is exempt from liens that normally protect subcontractors, suppliers and laborers from nonpayment. As such the Miller Act, Title 40 § U.S.C. 3131, was designed to protect subcontractors and suppliers providing labor and materials to a Federal project, and requires contractors to post a bond to […]

PAYMENT BOND CLAIMS AND PREVAILING PARTY ATTORNEY’S FEES

By: Douglas J. Roberts, Esq. and Alex Beck, Esq., Stearns, Roberts & Guttentag, LLC When evaluating a potential construction payment bond claim, claimants should not only consider the potential likelihood of success, but also the amount of attorney’s fees that all parties to the suit will incur as result of the litigation.  Under Florida law1, […]

SURETIES’ RIGHTS UNDER GENERAL INDEMNITY AGREEMENTS

By: Richard E. Guttentag, Esq. and Alexander S. Beck, Esq., Stearns, Roberts & Guttentag, LLC Prior to issuing payment or performance bonds, it is common for sureties to require contractors or subcontractors seeking bonding to execute a general indemnity agreement (“indemnity agreement”). In addition to the contractor entity executing the indemnity agreement, sureties generally require […]

FAILURE TO DISCLOSE SUBCONTRACTOR’S UNDERBIDDING OF PROJECT TO SURETY EXPOSES CONTRACTOR TO LIABILITY FOR FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION

By: Richard E. Guttentag, Esq., Stearns, Roberts & Guttentag, LLC As previously reported, the case of Allegheny Cas. Co. v. Archer-Western/Demaria Joint Venture III, 2014 WL 4162787 (M.D. Fla. August 21, 2014), involved a dispute between a General Contractor (“Contractor”) and a performance bond Surety (“Surety”) on a construction project.  In addition to the court’s […]